Effectiveness of the Implementation of Additional Criminal Execution Replacement Money in Corruption Crimes

Authors

  • Achmad Surya Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Gajah Putih University, Indonesia
  • Firdaus Diezo Faculty of Law Ekasakti University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32661/resam.v8i2.63

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Execution, Payment of Substitution, Corruption

Abstract

In the process of recovering state financial losses, the Prosecutor's Office has an obligation to return state finances due to corruption. The purpose of this study is to examine the implementation of the additional criminal execution of substitute money and its obstacles by the Central Aceh District Attorney against corruption cases. This type of research is empirical normative research by analyzing primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques used are direct interviews with informants and document studies. Furthermore, the collected data is processed by qualitative analysis. The execution of additional criminal compensation by the Central Aceh District Prosecutor's Office has been carried out well and effectively. Obstacles to the Central Aceh District Attorney's Office in carrying out additional criminal executions of replacement money, namely: First, the difficulty of tracing the assets of the suspect/defendant in an effort to recover state financial losses. Second, convicts of criminal acts of corruption prefer to undergo a subsidiary sentence of imprisonment/corporate law rather than paying replacement money.

References

REFERENCE

A. Books

Arief, B.A. (2003). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung, 2003.

Ali, A. (1990). Mengembara Di Belantara Hukum. Lembaga Penerbit Universitas Hasanuddin: Makasar.

Hartanti, E. (2007). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

Hiariej, E.O.S. (2016). Eksistensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Demi Keadilan, Antologi Hukum Pidana dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Pustaka Kemang: Jakarta.

Mulkan, H. (2022). Buku Ajar Hukum Tindak Pidana Khusus. Noer Fikri: Palembang.

Mulyadi, L. (2011). Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Normatif, Teoritis, Praktek dan Masalahnya. PT. Alumni: Bandung.

Sudarto. (2010). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, PT. Alumni: Bandung.

Sunaryo. S. (2005). Kapita Selekta Peradilan Pidana. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang: Malang.

B. Journal Article

Arjaya, B. W. (2016). Peran Vital Penelusuran Aset Guna Menentukan Besaran Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Terhadap Koruptor. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i1.2656.

Hadipratikto, M. (2012). Eksekusi Putusan Pidana Uang Pengganti dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum Untan, 2(2), 1-16.

Mulatua, S & Nggeboe, F., (2017). Efektivitas Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Legalias: Jurnal Hukum, 9(1), 46-79.

Munzil, F., dkk, (2015). Kesebandingan Pidana Uang Pengganti dan Pengganti Pidana Uang Pegganti Dalam Rangka Melindungi Hak Ekonomi Negara dan Kepastian Hukumâ€, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 22(1), 25-53.

Suhendar, S. (2019). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Optik Hukum Pidana. Pamulang Law Review, 1(1), 85-100. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v1i1.2849.

Surya, A. (2018). Problematika Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa Di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah. RESAM Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 1–16.

Yusuf, M. (2018). Eksekusi Terhadap Pidana Tambahan Berupa Uang Pengganti Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Padang (Studi Putusan Nomor: 19/Pid.Sus-TPK/2015/PN Pdg). UNES Law Review, 1(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.31933/law.v1i1.8.

C. Regulation

Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption

Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number: PER-027/A/JA/10/2014 concerning Guidelines for Asset Recovery.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-24

How to Cite

Surya, A., & Diezo, F. (2022). Effectiveness of the Implementation of Additional Criminal Execution Replacement Money in Corruption Crimes. RESAM Jurnal Hukum, 8(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.32661/resam.v8i2.63

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): RESAM Jurnal Hukum

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.