Settlement of Minor Crimes Against Perpetrators Who Have a Family Relationship with One of the Sarak Opat Devices

Authors

  • Supiandi Cibro Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Muhammadiyah Takengon, Indonesia
  • Achmad Surya Universitas Gajah Putih, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32661/resam.v10i2.93

Keywords:

Settlement, Misdemeanor Offenses, Family Relationships, Sarak Opat.

Abstract

The community in Central Aceh Regency, in resolving cases in the community, is still partly through customary law institutions, where disputes that occur are resolved by sarak opat. However, in its implementation, the community is still not satisfied with the decision of the sarak opat in the settlement of the case that occurred, because the settlement of the case through the sarak opat still has a settlement of cases that have a family relationship or the occurrence of a conflict of interest with one of the sarak opat devices. The purpose of this study is to find out the process of settling minor crimes against litigants who have a family relationship with one of the apparatus. This type of research is empirical juridical, namely legal research that is initially studied as secondary data, then continued with research on primary data in the field. The data sources used in the research are literature studies and field studies. The data were analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that the process of settling minor crimes against litigants who have a family relationship with one of the sarak opat devices is carried out simply by emphasizing the aspect of consensus deliberation to achieve peace from the disputing parties.

References

A. Book

Djamanat Samosir, 2013, Hukum Adat Indonesia Eksistensi Dalam Dinamika Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia, Nuansa Aulia, Bandung Nuansa Aulia, Bandung.

Hader Leuddjeng., 2013, Mempertimbangkan Peradilan Adat, Seri Pengembangan Wacana Perkumpulan untuk Pembaharuan Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologis (HuMa), Jakarta.

Hilman Hadikusuma, 1989, Peradilan Adat di Indonesia, CV Miswar, Jakarta.

Muhammad Daud Ali, 1991, Hukum Adat Gayo : Penelitian Awal Mengenai Hubungan Hukum Adat dengan Hukum Islam Masyarakat Indonesia, Indonesia, Jakarta.

Sjachran Basah, 1997, Eksistensi Dan Tolok Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi Di Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung.

Sudikno Mertokosumo, 1971, Sejarah Peradilan Dan Perundang-Undangannya Di Indonesiasejak 1942 Dan Apakah Kemanfaatan Bagi Kita Bangsa Indonesia, Kilat Maju Bandung, Kilat Maju Bandung.

Syahrizal, 2004, Hukum Adat dan hukum Islam di Indonesia, Nadiya Foundation Nanggroe Aceh, Banda Aceh.

B. Article Journal

Muhar Junef, “Penerapan Sanksi Adat Kepada Perusahaan Dan Pihak Lain Dalam Peradilan Adatâ€, e-Journal Widya Yustisia, Volume 1 Nomor 2 Februari 2015.

C. Regulation

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaaan Kehakiman

Qanun Aceh Nomor 9 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pembinaan Kehidupan Adat dan Adat Istiadat

Qanun Kabupaten Aceh Tengah Nomor 10 Tahun 2002 tentang Hukum Adat Gayo

Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 60 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat dan Istiadat.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Cibro, S., & Surya, A. (2024). Settlement of Minor Crimes Against Perpetrators Who Have a Family Relationship with One of the Sarak Opat Devices. RESAM Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.32661/resam.v10i2.93

Citation Check